Are political commentators actually trying to help their movements, or is it all just a massive grift for clicks, ad revenue, and clout? Lately, the timeline has been dominated by the Savanna Cannon current "cootermaxxing" trend—where right-wing political commentary is essentially a thinly veiled funnel for OnlyFans—and the controversy surrounding Hasan's Mao suite, where he chose to wear a Chairman Mao outfit to a public DSA college event.

In this video, we break down how both sides of the political aisle are playing the exact same game. From the right-wing outrage machine platforming questionable figures to Hasan Piker's clout-chasing LARP as a dictator, the modern political commentary cottage industry is built entirely on rage bait and negativity. In fact, these commentators actually thrive when their side is losing because the algorithm rewards constant outrage and finger-pointing.

The honest truth? You don't need them. Stop wasting your time stroking your ego with streamers and podcasters who likely don't even vote in their own local elections. It’s time to stop engaging with this late-stage political grift and start taking action in your actual local community, where your voice and vote matter most.


What are your thoughts on the current state of political commentary? Let me know down in the comments! If you agree that we need to focus on our local communities instead of engaging with internet grifters, make sure to like and subscribe. (And if you're mad about me calling out the Mao suit LARP, feel free to leave a hate comment and a dislike down below!)


#HasanPiker #Cootermaxxing #HasanMaoSuit